<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://equityhealthj.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Journal for Equity in Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by International Journal for Equity in Health</description>
        <dc:date>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/45" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/44" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/43" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/7">
        <title>The influence of the rural health security schemes on health utilization and household impoverishment in rural China: data from a household survey of western and central China </title>
        <description>Background:
The New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS, voluntary health insurance) and the Medical Financial Assistance (MFA, financial relief program) were established in 2003 for rural China. The aim of this study was to document their coverage, assess their effectiveness on access to in-patient care and protection against financial catastrophe and household impoverishment due to health spending, and identify the factors predicting impoverishment with and without these schemes.
Methods:
A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in 2008 in Hebei and Shaanxi provinces and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region using a multi-stage sampling technique. Information on personal demographic characteristics, chronic illness status, health care use, household expenditure, and household health spending were collected by interview.
Results:
NRCMS covered 90.8% of the studied individuals and among the designated poor, 7.6% had their premiums paid by MFA. Of those referred for hospitalization in the year prior to the interview, 34.3% failed to comply, mostly (80.2%) owing to financial constraints. There was no significant difference in the unmet need for admission between the insured with NRCMS and the uninsured. Before reimbursement, the incidence of catastrophic health payment (household health spending more than 40% of household&apos;s capacity to pay) and medical impoverishment (household per capita income falling below the poverty line due to medical expense) was 14.3% and 8.2%, respectively. NRCMS prevented 9.9% of the households from financial catastrophe and 7.7% from impoverishment, whereas MFA kept just one household from impoverishment and had no effect on financial catastrophe. Household per capita expenditure and household chronic disease proportion (proportion of members of a household with chronic illness) were the most important determinants of the unmet need for admission, risk of being impoverished and the chance of not being saved from impoverishment.
Conclusion:
The coverage of NRCMS among the rural population was high but not adequate to improve access to in-patient care and protect against financial catastrophe and household impoverishment due to health payment, especially for the poor and the chronically ill. Furthermore, MFA played almost no such role; therefore, the current schemes need to be improved.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Wuxiang Shi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Geater</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Junhua Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hong Zhang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniele Brombal</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/6">
        <title>Inequalities in the psychological well-being of employed, single and partnered mothers: the role of psychosocial work quality and work-family conflict
</title>
        <description>Background:
A large body of international research reveals that single mothers experience poorer mental health than their partnered counterparts, with socioeconomic disadvantage identified as an important contributory factor in understanding this health disparity. Much less research, however, has focused specifically on the psychological well-being of single mothers who are employed, despite their growing presence in the labor force. Of the research which has considered employment, the focus has been on employment status per se rather than on other important work-related factors which may impact psychological health, such as psychosocial work quality and work-family conflict. The aim of this study was to: (1) compare employed single mothers and employed partnered mothers on measures of psychological distress, psychosocial work quality and work-family conflict; and (2) explore the potential role of work-family conflict and psychosocial work quality as explanations for any observed differences in psychological distress based on partner status.MethodAnalysis of data obtained from a cross-sectional telephone survey of employed parents in a mid-sized Western Canadian city. Analyses were based on 674 employed mothers (438 partnered and 236 single), who were 25-50 years old, with at least one child in the household.
Results:
Compared to employed single mothers, employed partnered mothers were older, had more education and reported fewer hours of paid work. Single mothers reported higher levels of psychological distress, financial hardship, work-family conflict and poor psychosocial work quality. Statistical adjustment for income adequacy, psychosocial work quality and work-family conflict each independently resulted in single motherhood no longer being associated with psychological distress.
Conclusions:
While single employed mothers did experience higher levels of psychological distress than their partnered counterparts, differences between these groups of women in income adequacy, psychosocial work quality, and work-family conflict were found to explain this relationship. Future research employing a longitudinal design and subject to lower selection biases is required to tease out the interrelationship of these three life strains and to point to the most appropriate economic and social policies to support single mothers in the workforce.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Ewelina Dziak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bonnie Janzen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nazeem Muhajarine</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/5">
        <title>Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women&apos;s health research 
</title>
        <description>Women&apos;s health research strives to make change. It seeks to produce knowledge that promotes action on the variety of factors that affect women&apos;s lives and their health. As part of this general movement, important strides have been made to raise awareness of the health effects of sex and gender. The resultant base of knowledge has been used to inform health research, policy, and practice. Increasingly, however, the need to pay better attention to the inequities among women that are caused by racism, colonialism, ethnocentrism, heterosexism, and able-bodism, is confronting feminist health researchers and activists. Researchers are seeking new conceptual frameworks that can transform the design of research to produce knowledge that captures how systems of discrimination or subordination overlap and &quot;articulate&quot; with one another. An emerging paradigm for women&apos;s health research is intersectionality. Intersectionality places an explicit focus on differences among groups and seeks to illuminate various interacting social factors that affect human lives, including social locations, health status, and quality of life. This paper will draw on recently emerging intersectionality research in the Canadian women&apos;s health context in order to explore the promises and practical challenges of the processes involved in applying an intersectionality paradigm. We begin with a brief overview of why the need for an intersectionality approach has emerged within the context of women&apos;s health research and introduce current thinking about how intersectionality can inform and transform health research more broadly. We then highlight novel Canadian research that is grappling with the challenges in addressing issues of difference and diversity. In the analysis of these examples, we focus on a largely uninvestigated aspect of intersectionality research - the challenges involved in the process of initiating and developing such projects and, in particular, the meaning and significance of social locations for researchers and participants who utilize an intersectionality approach. The examples highlighted in the paper represent important shifts in the health field, demonstrating the potential of intersectionality for examining the social context of women&apos;s lives, as well as developing methods which elucidate power, create new knowledge, and have the potential to inform appropriate action to bring about positive social change.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Olena Hankivsky</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Colleen Reid</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Renee Cormier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Colleen Varcoe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Natalie Clark</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cecilia Benoit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shari Brotman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/4">
        <title>Controlling for race/ethnicity: a comparison of California commercial health plans CAHPS scores to NCBD benchmarks</title>
        <description>Background:
Because California has higher managed care penetration and the race/ethnicity of Californians differs from the rest of the United States, we tested the hypothesis that California&apos;s lower health plan Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS&#174;) survey results are attributable to the state&apos;s racial/ethnic composition.
Methods:
California CAHPS survey responses for commercial health plans were compared to national responses for five selected measures: three global ratings of doctor, health plan and health care, and two composite scores regarding doctor communication and staff courtesy, respect, and helpfulness. We used the 2005 National CAHPS 3.0 Benchmarking Database to assess patient experiences of care. Multiple stepwise logistic regression was used to see if patient experience ratings based on CAHPS responses in California commercial health plans differed from all other states combined.
Results:
CAHPS patient experience responses in California were not significantly different than the rest of the nation after adjusting for age, general health rating, individual health plan, education, time in health plan, race/ethnicity, and gender. Both California and national patient experience scores varied by race/ethnicity. In both California and the rest of the nation Blacks tended to be more satisfied, while Asians were less satisfied.
Conclusions:
California commercial health plan enrollees rate their experiences of care similarly to enrollees in the rest of the nation when seven different variables including race/ethnicity are considered. These findings support accounting for more than just age, gender and general health rating before comparing health plans from one state to another. Reporting on race/ethnicity disparities in member experiences of care could raise awareness and increase accountability for reducing these racial and ethnic disparities.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>John Zweifler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Hughes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebeca Lopez</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/3">
        <title>Socioeconomic inequalities in general and psychological health among adolescents: a cross-sectional study in senior high schools in Greece</title>
        <description>Background:
Socioeconomic health inequalities in adolescence are not consistently reported. This may be due to the measurement of self-reported general health, which probably fails to fully capture the psychological dimension of health, and the reliance on traditional socio-economic indicators, such as parental education or occupational status. The present study aimed at investigating this issue using simple questions to assess both the physical and psychological dimension of health and a broader set of socioeconomic indicators than previously used.
Methods:
This was a cross-sectional survey of 5614 adolescents aged 16-18 years-old from 25 senior high schools in Greece. Self-reported general and psychological health were both measured by means of a simple Likert-type question. We assessed the following socio-economic variables: parents&apos; education, parents&apos; employment status, a subjective assessment of the financial difficulties experienced by the family and adolescents&apos; own academic performance as a measure of the personal social position in the school setting.
Results:
One out of ten (10%) and one out of three (32%) adolescents did not enjoy good general and psychological health respectively. For both health variables robust associations were found in adolescents who reported more financial difficulties in the family and had a worse academic performance. The latter was associated with psychological health in a more linear way. Father&apos;s unemployment showed a non-significant trend for an association with worse psychological health in girls only.
Conclusions:
Socioeconomic inequalities exist in this period of life but are more easily demonstrated with more subjective socioeconomic indicators, especially for the psychological dimension of health.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Konstantina Magklara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Petros Skapinakis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dimitrios Niakas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefanos Bellos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anastasia Zissi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stylianos Stylianidis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Venetsanos Mavreas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/2">
        <title>Equity of access to cardiac rehabilitation: the role of system factors</title>
        <description>Background:
When patient selection processes determine who can and cannot use healthcare there can be inequalities and inequities in individuals&apos; opportunities to benefit. This paper evaluates the influence of a hospital selection process on opportunities to access outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR).
Methods:
A secondary data analysis was conducted on a cohort of inpatients (n = 2,375) who were all eligible for invitation to an Australian CR program. Eligibility was determined by hospital discharge diagnosis codes. Only invited patients could attend. Logistic regression analysis tested the extent to which individual patient characteristics were statistically significantly associated with the outcome &apos;invitation&apos; after adjusting for cardiac disease and other factors.
Results:
Less than half of the eligible patients were invited to the CR program. After allowing for known factors that may have justified not being selected, there was bias towards inviting males, younger patients, married patients, and patients who nominated English as their preferred language.
Conclusions:
Health service managers typically monitor service utilisation patterns as indicators of access but often pay little attention to ways in which locally determined system factors influence access to care. The paper shows how a hospital selection process can unreasonably influence patients&apos; opportunities to benefit from an evidence-based healthcare program.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Stewart Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julie Byles</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kerry Inder</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/1">
        <title>Willingness to pay for rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis and treatment of malaria in southeast Nigeria: ex post and ex ante</title>
        <description>Background:
The introduction of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) has improved the diagnosis and treatment of malaria. However, any successful control of malaria will depend on socio-economic factors that influence its management in the community. Willingness to pay (WTP) is important because consumer responses to prices will influence utilization of services and revenues collected. Also the consumer&apos;s attitude can influence monetary valuation with respect to different conditions ex post and ex ante.
Methods:
WTP for RDT for Malaria was assessed by the contingent valuation method using a bidding game approach in rural and urban communities in southeast Nigeria. The ex post WTP was assessed at the health centers on 618 patients immediately following diagnosis of malaria with RDT and the ex ante WTP was assessed by household interviews on 1020 householders with a prior history of malaria.
Results:
For the ex ante WTP, 51% of the respondents in urban and 24.7% in rural areas were willing to pay for RDT. The mean WTP (235.49 naira) in urban is higher than WTP (182.05 Naira) in rural areas. For the ex post WTP, 89 and 90.7% of the respondents in urban and rural areas respectively were WTP. The mean WTP (372.30 naira) in urban is also higher than (296.28 naira) in rural areas. For the ex post scenario, the lower two Social Economic Status (SES) quartiles were more willing to pay and the mean WTP is higher than the higher two SES while in the ex ante scenario, the higher two SES quartiles were more WTP and with a higher WTP than the lower two SES quartile. Ex ante and ex post WTP were directly dependent on costs.
Conclusion:
The ex post WTP is higher than the ex ante WTP and both are greater than the current cost of RDTs. Urban dwellers were more willing to pay than the rural dwellers. The mean WTP should be considered when designing suitable financial strategies for making RDTs available to communities.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Benjamin Uzochukwu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Obinna Onwujekwe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nkoli Uguru</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maduka Ughasoro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ogochukwu Ezeoke</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, 9:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/45">
        <title>Are there geographic and socio-economic differences in incidence, burden and prevention of malaria? A study in southeast Nigeria</title>
        <description>RationaleIt is not clearly evident whether malaria affects the poor more although it has been argued that the poor bear a very high burden of the disease. This study explored the socioeconomic and geographic differences in incidence and burden of malaria as well as ownership of mosquito nets.
Methods:
Structured questionnaires were used to collect information from 1657 respondents from rural and urban communities in southeast Nigeria on: incidence of malaria, number of days lost to malaria; actions to treat malaria and household ownership of insecticide treated and untreated mosquito nets. Data was compared across socio-economic status (SES) quartiles and between urban and rural dwellers.
Results:
There was statistically significant urban-rural difference in malaria occurrence with malaria occurring more amongst urban dwellers. There was more reported occurrence of malaria amongst children and other adult household members in better-off SES groups compared to worse-off SES groups, but not amongst respondents. The average number of days that people delayed before seeking treatment was two days, and both adults and children were ill with malaria for about six days. Better-off SES quartile and urban dwellers owned more mosquito nets (p &lt; 0.05) (treated and untreated).
Conclusion:
Malaria occurs more amongst better-off SES groups and urban dwellers in southeast Nigeria. Deployment of malaria control interventions should ensure universal access since targeting the poor and other supposedly vulnerable groups may exclude people that really require malaria control services.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/45</link>
                <dc:creator>Obinna Onwujekwe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Benjamin Uzochukwu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nkem Dike</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chijioke Okoli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Soludo Eze</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ogoamaka Chukwuogo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:45</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-45</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/44">
        <title>The influence of insurance status on waiting times in German acute care hospitals: an empirical analysis of new data</title>
        <description>Background:
There is an ongoing debate in Germany about the assumption that patients with private health insurance (PHI) benefit from better access to medical care, including shorter waiting times (L&#252;ngen et al. 2008), compared to patients with statutory health insurance (SHI).ProblemExisting analyses of the determinants for waiting times in Germany are a) based on patient self-reports and b) do not cover the inpatient sector. This paper aims to fill both gaps by (i) generating new primary data and (ii) analyzing waiting times in German hospitals.
Methods:
We requested individual appointments from 485 hospitals within an experimental study design, allowing us to analyze the impact of PHI versus SHI on waiting times (Asplin et al. 2005).
Results:
In German acute care hospitals patients with PHI have significantly shorter waiting times than patients with SHI.
Conclusion:
Discrimination in waiting times by insurance status does occur in the German acute hospital sector. Since there is very little transparency in treatment quality in Germany, we do not know whether discrimination in waiting times leads to discrimination in the quality of treatment. This is an important issue for future research.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/44</link>
                <dc:creator>Bjorn Kuchinke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dirk Sauerland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ansgar Wuebker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:44</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-44</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/43">
        <title>Towards equitable access to medicines for the rural poor: analyses of insurance claims reveal rural pharmacy initiative triggers price competition in Kyrgyzstan</title>
        <description>Background:
A rural pharmacy initiative (RPI) designed to increase access to medicines in rural Kyrgyzstan created a network of 12 pharmacies using a revolving drug fund mechanism in 12 villages where no pharmacies previously existed. The objective of this study was to determine if the establishment of the RPI resulted in the unforeseen benefit of triggering medicine price competition in pre-existing (non-RPI) private pharmacies located in the region.
Methods:
We conducted descriptive and multivariate analyses on medicine insurance claims data from Kyrgyzstan&apos;s Mandatory Health Insurance Fund for the Jumgal District of Naryn Province from October 2003 to December 2007. We compared average quarterly medicine prices in competitor pharmacies before and after the introduction of the rural pharmacy initiative in October 2004 to determine the RPI impact on price competition.
Results:
Descriptive analyses suggest competitors reacted to RPI prices for 21 of 30 (70%) medicines. Competitor medicine prices from the quarter before RPI introduction to the end of the study period decreased for 17 of 30 (57%) medicines, increased for 4 of 30 (13%) medicines, and remained unchanged for 9 of 30 (30%) medicines. Among the 9 competitor medicines with unchanged prices, five initially decreased in price but later reverted back to baseline prices. Multivariate analyses on 19 medicines that met sample size criteria confirm these findings. Fourteen of these 19 (74%) competitor medicines changed significantly in price from the quarter before RPI introduction to the quarter after RPI introduction, with 9 of 19 (47%) decreasing in price and 5 of 19 (26%) increasing in price.
Conclusions:
The RPI served as a market driver, spurring competition in medicine prices in competitor pharmacies, even when they were located in different villages. Initiatives designed to increase equitable access to medicines in rural regions of developing and transitional countries should consider the potential to leverage medicine price competition as a means of achieving their goal. Evaluations of interventions to increase rural access to medicines should include impact assessment on both formal and informal pharmaceutical markets.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/43</link>
                <dc:creator>Brenda Waning</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jason Maddix</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yorghos Tripodis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Laing</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leufkens Hubert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manjusha Gokhale</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:43</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-43</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>43</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
